Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung CL80
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung CL80, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and CL80 (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH25 was launched 7 months later than the CL80 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-FH25 grades versus the CL80 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Samsung CL80. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung CL80
| EX-FH25 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2010 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 7 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Casio EX-FH25
| CL80 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.7" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung CL80
| EX-FH25 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 enjoys physical dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") along with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Samsung CL80 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung CL80 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-FH25 versus the CL80.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and CL80 is 69 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by reading technical specs. The visual here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and CL80.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung CL80 to offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The newer EX-FH25 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung CL80 |
| Also called | - | ST5500 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 pounds) | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $450 | $400 |