Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung EX2F
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
90 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Released December 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung EX2F, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is fairly similar but the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") boast different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-FH25 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the EX2F and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-FH25 matches up against the EX2F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Samsung EX2F. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung EX2F
| EX-FH25 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Casio EX-FH25
| EX2F | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 | July 2010 | More recent by 29 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung EX2F
| EX-FH25 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 provides outer dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Samsung EX2F has measurements of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung EX2F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-FH25 versus the EX2F.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and EX2F is 69 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The photograph here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and EX2F.
Plainly, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-FH25 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Samsung EX2F will deliver more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung EX2F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-07-06 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lb) | 294 grams (0.65 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $478 |