Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Announced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Released August 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-FH25 was brought out 3 years before the Galaxy Camera 3G and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-FH25 grades against the Galaxy Camera 3G in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| EX-FH25 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Casio EX-FH25
| Galaxy Camera 3G | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 | July 2010 | More recent by 26 months | |
| Screen size | 4.8" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| EX-FH25 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 offers external measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") and a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the Galaxy Camera 3G.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and Galaxy Camera 3G is 69 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing specifications. The photograph underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and Galaxy Camera 3G.
Plainly, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G to provide you with greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2012-08-29 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | - |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 4.8 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 pounds) | 305 gr (0.67 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $450 | $606 |