Clicky

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G

Portability
69
Imaging
33
Features
37
Overall
34
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 front
 
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G front
Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
44
Overall
41

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs

Casio EX-FH25
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
  • Announced July 2010
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 4.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-481mm (F) lens
  • 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
  • Released August 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview

Here, we will be looking at the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-FH25 was brought out 3 years before the Galaxy Camera 3G and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-FH25 grades against the Galaxy Camera 3G in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

				

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G

 EX-FH25 Galaxy Camera 3G 
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Screen resolution230k0kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Casio EX-FH25

 Galaxy Camera 3G EX-FH25 
ReleasedAugust 2012July 2010More recent by 26 months
Screen size4.8"3"Bigger screen (+1.8")
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G

 EX-FH25 Galaxy Camera 3G 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 offers external measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") and a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the Galaxy Camera 3G.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and Galaxy Camera 3G is 69 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing specifications. The photograph underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and Galaxy Camera 3G.

Plainly, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G to provide you with greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-FH25
Portrait photography with Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
35
has manual focus
delivers RAW formats
no external flash support
MP count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
30
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 Street photography highlights
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Street photography highlights
51
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
heavier than average (524g)
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (305 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G as a Sports photography camera
41
amazing zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
max frames per second high (40.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
44
excellent zoom range (23-481mm 20.9 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G as a Travel photography camera
49
has built in flash
quite wide (26mm)
great reach (520mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than average (524g)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
72
lighter than average (305 grams)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
reasonably wide (23mm)
great zoom (481mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
no Time Lapse recording
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 Landscape photography info
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Landscape photography info
45
has manual focus
quite wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse function
47
reasonably wide (23mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
bigger than average screen (4.8")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 Vlogging information
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Vlogging information
22
quite wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly display
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic port
heavier than average (524g)
36
reasonably wide (23mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (305 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
no mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
 Casio Exilim EX-FH25Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
General Information
Make Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-FH25 Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2010-07-06 2012-08-29
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - 1.4GHz Quad-Core
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 -
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-520mm (20.0x) 23-481mm (20.9x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-4.5 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 4.8 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dots 0k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds -
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Continuous shutter rate 40.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.30 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 524 gr (1.16 pounds) 305 gr (0.67 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $450 $606