Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung HZ35W
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Announced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FH25 was revealed very close to the HZ35W so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-FH25 grades versus the HZ35W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung HZ35W
| EX-FH25 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Casio EX-FH25
| HZ35W | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung HZ35W
| EX-FH25 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2010 |  | June 2010 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH25 has got physical measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") along with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH25 against the HZ35W.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and HZ35W is 69 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing specs. The graphic below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and HZ35W.
All in all, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung HZ35W to produce more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called | - | WB650 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $450 | $300 |