Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL102
69 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL102, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is very similar and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FH25 was revealed 19 months later than the SL102 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-FH25 matches up against the SL102 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Samsung SL102. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-FH25 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 19 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-FH25
| SL102 | EX-FH25 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung SL102
| EX-FH25 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 enjoys outside dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the SL102.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and SL102 is 69 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specs. The photograph here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and SL102.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP so you can expect similar quality of files although you should take the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer EX-FH25 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung SL102 |
| Other name | - | ES55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $450 | $130 |
