Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL720
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
94 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL720 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released July 2009
- Also Known as PL70
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL720 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung SL720, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the SL720 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH25 was released 12 months later than the SL720 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL720 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-FH25 scores vs the SL720 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL720 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung SL720. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung SL720 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung SL720
EX-FH25 | SL720 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2010 | July 2009 | More recent by 12 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL720 over the Casio EX-FH25
SL720 | EX-FH25 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung SL720
EX-FH25 | SL720 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL720 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 features outer dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Samsung SL720 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung SL720 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the SL720.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and SL720 is 69 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL720 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing specifications. The visual below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and SL720.
Plainly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung SL720 to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-FH25 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL720 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung SL720 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung SL720 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung SL720 |
Also called as | - | PL70 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2009-07-14 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 524 gr (1.16 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $450 | $119 |