Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST100
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST100 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung ST100, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and ST100 (14MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH25 was revealed 7 months later than the ST100 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-FH25 scores vs the ST100 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Samsung ST100. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung ST100
| EX-FH25 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2010 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 7 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Casio EX-FH25
| ST100 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+922k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung ST100
| EX-FH25 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH25 comes with exterior dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Samsung ST100 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung ST100 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the ST100.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and ST100 is 69 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to see the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and ST100.
Clearly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung ST100 to render greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher EX-FH25 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung ST100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung ST100 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-07-06 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.6-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $450 | $250 |