Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST150F
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34


96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2013

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung ST150F, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and ST150F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-FH25 was launched 3 years before the ST150F which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST150F being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-FH25 scores versus the ST150F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung ST150F. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung ST150F
EX-FH25 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Casio EX-FH25
ST150F | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2010 | More modern by 30 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung ST150F
EX-FH25 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH25 has external dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Samsung ST150F has specifications of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung ST150F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the ST150F.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and ST150F is 69 and 96 respectively.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The pic here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and ST150F.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Samsung ST150F to render extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 will be behind in sensor tech.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung ST150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung ST150F |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.30 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lb) | 114 grams (0.25 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $450 | $300 |