Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST93
69 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released April 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung ST93, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and ST93 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FH25 was revealed 9 months earlier than the ST93 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-FH25 matches up vs the ST93 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Samsung ST93. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung ST93
| EX-FH25 | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Casio EX-FH25
| ST93 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2011 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 9 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung ST93
| EX-FH25 | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 enjoys exterior dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Samsung ST93 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung ST93 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the ST93.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and ST93 is 69 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and ST93.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Samsung ST93 to resolve extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung ST93 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung ST93 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2011-04-20 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524g (1.16 lb) | 110g (0.24 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $450 | - |
