Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e49ae/e49aef02731bb86879a7a1fb2af553da6ffe5e22" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FH25 front Casio Exilim EX-FH25 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c780/4c7803d7ef97099f59a984f593bafa5d4197373a" alt="Samsung TL225 front Samsung TL225 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2009
- Other Name is ST550
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The EX-FH25 was unveiled 11 months later than the TL225 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-FH25 matches up vs the TL225 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung TL225. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung TL225
EX-FH25 | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2010 | ![]() | August 2009 | More recent by 11 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-FH25
TL225 | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1152k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+922k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung TL225
EX-FH25 | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH25 offers external dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") and a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH25 and the TL225.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d056/7d05685551396cad705b533d26b1c0bba778a92c" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 size comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and TL225 is 69 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d06ef/d06efbada20e6cd19643b84f81d72f51ee4494f9" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and TL225.
Plainly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung TL225 to result in greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern EX-FH25 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bf5d/0bf5d65775ac995c449f072de3f7d6af1947535d" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/100da/100da55332cb74a0e37c87abf3387563c06131eb" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung TL225 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung TL225 |
Also called as | - | ST550 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2009-08-13 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,152k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.30 m | 3.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 524g (1.16 lbs) | 187g (0.41 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $450 | $488 |