Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL500
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Revealed July 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Launched July 2010
- Additionally referred to as EX1
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung TL500, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the TL500 (10MP) is relatively similar but the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") use different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH25 was released at a similar time to the TL500 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL500 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-FH25 matches up versus the TL500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung TL500. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung TL500
EX-FH25 | TL500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Casio EX-FH25
TL500 | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung TL500
EX-FH25 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2010 | July 2010 | Similar generation | |
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 has exterior dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") and a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung TL500 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the TL500.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and TL500 is 69 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and TL500.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same megapixel count albeit different sensor dimensions. The EX-FH25 offers the tinier sensor which should make getting shallower DOF more challenging.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung TL500 |
Other name | - | EX1 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2010-07-09 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.30 m | 5.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 524 gr (1.16 lb) | 386 gr (0.85 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $450 | $527 |