Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB2200F
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Revealed January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FH25 was unveiled 4 years before the WB2200F which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-FH25 matches up against the WB2200F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung WB2200F. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung WB2200F
| EX-FH25 | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-FH25
| WB2200F | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 42 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB2200F
| EX-FH25 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 features exterior dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") and a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has measurements of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung WB2200F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FH25 against the WB2200F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and WB2200F is 69 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by researching a spec sheet. The pic below may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and WB2200F.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB2200F to result in greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524g (1.16 lbs) | 708g (1.56 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $450 | $599 |