Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB30F
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung WB30F, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and WB30F (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FH25 was announced 3 years before the WB30F and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-FH25 matches up against the WB30F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung WB30F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung WB30F
| EX-FH25 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-FH25
| WB30F | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 30 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB30F
| EX-FH25 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH25 provides outside dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung WB30F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the WB30F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and WB30F is 69 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and WB30F.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should count on the Samsung WB30F to show more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB30F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lb) | 128 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $450 | $180 |