Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB350F
69 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FH25 was introduced 4 years before the WB350F which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-FH25 grades versus the WB350F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung WB350F
| EX-FH25 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-FH25
| WB350F | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 42 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB350F
| EX-FH25 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 offers outside measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB350F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the WB350F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and WB350F is 69 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over a spec sheet. The image underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and WB350F.
As you can see, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung WB350F to offer extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB350F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-07-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 lb) | 276 gr (0.61 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $260 |
