Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB700
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Revealed July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched December 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung WB700, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and WB700 (14MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FH25 was manufactured 5 months earlier than the WB700 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-FH25 grades versus the WB700 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Samsung WB700. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung WB700
| EX-FH25 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Casio EX-FH25
| WB700 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB700
| EX-FH25 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 |  | December 2010 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 enjoys exterior dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") along with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung WB700 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-FH25 against the WB700.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and WB700 is 69 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements just by going over specifications. The visual here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and WB700.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB700 to offer you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a little more aggressively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB700 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $450 | $300 |