Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB750
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Announced September 2011
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB750, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and WB750 (13MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH25 was manufactured 14 months earlier than the WB750 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-FH25 scores versus the WB750 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Samsung WB750. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung WB750
| EX-FH25 | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Casio EX-FH25
| WB750 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2011 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 14 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB750
| EX-FH25 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 offers outside dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB750 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB750 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-FH25 versus the WB750.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and WB750 is 69 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions only by checking out specs. The picture underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and WB750.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB750 to provide more detail due to its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB750 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-07-06 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $450 | $339 |