Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB800F
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below, we are looking at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FH25 was announced 3 years prior to the WB800F and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-FH25 matches up vs the WB800F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung WB800F
| EX-FH25 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-FH25
| WB800F | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 30 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB800F
| EX-FH25 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH25 has outside dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-FH25 against the WB800F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and WB800F is 69 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The photograph underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and WB800F.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to deliver more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images much more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524g (1.16 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $450 | $300 |