Clicky

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
69
Imaging
34
Features
37
Overall
35
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Casio EX-FH25
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
  • Launched July 2010
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Announced February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Below, we are contrasting the Casio EX-FH25 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The EX-FH25 was launched 4 years prior to the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-FH25 scores vs the DP2 Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-FH25 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-FH25

 DP2 Quattro EX-FH25 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014July 2010Fresher by 43 months
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-FH25 DP2 Quattro 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 provides exterior dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") along with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-FH25 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-FH25 and the DP2 Quattro.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and DP2 Quattro is 69 and 70 respectively.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can see, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-FH25 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will produce more detail utilizing its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 Portrait photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography details
36
you can focus manually
delivers RAW files
external flash not possible
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
77
focusing manually
good resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-FH25
Street photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
51
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than others in class (524g)
61
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 Sports photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography info
42
incredible zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
max frames per second high (40.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
48
good resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 Travel photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography factors
49
has built in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
very long zoom (520mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (524 grams)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
53
good resolution (20MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
45
you can focus manually
fairly wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have Timelapse mode
59
focusing manually
good sized screen (3")
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Vlogging camera
22
fairly wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have microphone port
more heavy than others in class (524 grams)
9
no video
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FH25 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Casio Exilim EX-FH25Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Casio Sigma
Model type Casio Exilim EX-FH25 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-07-06 2014-02-13
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TRUE III engine
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-520mm (20.0x) 45mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-4.5 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 40.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.30 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 524g (1.16 pounds) 395g (0.87 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $450 $931