Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD14
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
59 Imaging
42 Features
30 Overall
37
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD14 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Revealed July 2010
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Launched September 2006
- Old Model is Sigma SD10
- Newer Model is Sigma SD15
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD14 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD14, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Casio and Sigma. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and SD14 (5MP) and the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and SD14 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH25 was manufactured 3 years after the SD14 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma SD14 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-FH25 scores against the SD14 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD14 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Sigma SD14. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Sigma SD14 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Sigma SD14
| EX-FH25 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 |  | September 2006 | More modern by 46 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 150k | Crisper screen (+80k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD14 over the Casio EX-FH25
| SD14 | EX-FH25 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Sigma SD14
| EX-FH25 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD14 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 has external measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD14 has dimensions of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") and a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD14 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-FH25 versus the SD14.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and SD14 is 69 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD14 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by researching specifications. The picture here might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and SD14.
To sum up, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-FH25 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Casio EX-FH25 will render extra detail due to its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-FH25 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD14 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD14 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Sigma SD14 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Sigma SD14 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2006-09-26 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 5MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 150 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lbs) | 750 grams (1.65 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $198 |