Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD9
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced November 2002
- Updated by Sigma SD10
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Casio EX-FH25 versus Sigma SD9, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Casio and Sigma. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-FH25 was brought out 7 years later than the SD9 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-FH25 scores vs the SD9 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Sigma SD9
EX-FH25 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | November 2002 | Fresher by 93 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 130k | Crisper screen (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Casio EX-FH25
SD9 | EX-FH25 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Sigma SD9
EX-FH25 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 has exterior dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FH25 versus Sigma SD9 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH25 against the SD9.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and SD9 is 69 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and SD9.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-FH25 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-FH25 will offer you greater detail having its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-FH25 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Sigma SD9 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 3MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 2268 x 1512 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.30 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 524g (1.16 lbs) | 950g (2.09 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $450 | $3,001 |