Clicky

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
69
Imaging
34
Features
37
Overall
35
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
53
Features
77
Overall
62

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Casio EX-FH25
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
  • Launched July 2010
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Launched March 2016
  • Old Model is Sony RX10 II
  • Later Model is Sony RX10 IV
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony RX10 III Overview

Below, we are matching up the Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony RX10 III, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") feature totally different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-FH25 was revealed 6 years prior to the RX10 III which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).

Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-FH25 grades versus the RX10 III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Sony RX10 III

 EX-FH25 RX10 III 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Casio EX-FH25

 RX10 III EX-FH25 
LaunchedMarch 2016July 2010More modern by 69 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1229k230kClearer display (+999k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Sony RX10 III

 EX-FH25 RX10 III 
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH25 has external dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") and a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony RX10 III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the RX10 III.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and RX10 III is 69 and 53 respectively.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specifications. The pic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and RX10 III.

To sum up, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-FH25 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony RX10 III will offer greater detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-FH25
Portrait photography with Sony RX10 III
36
you can focus manually
delivers RAW files
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
71
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
includes face detection focus
saves RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 as a Street photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Street photography camera
51
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition in class (524 grams)
64
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW files
environment sealing
more heavy than competition (1,051 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 Sports photography details
Sony RX10 III Sports photography details
42
amazing zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
high frames per second (40.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
70
incredible zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
includes tracking autofocus
environment sealing
better than average battery (420 CIPA)
no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 Travel photography factors
Sony RX10 III Travel photography factors
49
built-in flash
rather wide (26mm)
great zoom (520mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (524g)
megapixel count low (10MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
55
better than average battery (420 shots)
environment sealing
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (600mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (1,051 grams)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.4)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 Landscape photography details
Sony RX10 III Landscape photography details
45
you can focus manually
rather wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no Timelapse mode
64
focusing manually
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW files
environment sealing
better than average battery (420 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.4)
lack of Timelapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 as a Vlogging camera
Sony RX10 III as a Vlogging camera
22
rather wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
no microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (524 grams)
28
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
comes with external microphone socket
slow max aperture (f2.4)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
more heavy than competition (1,051 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FH25 and Sony RX10 III
 Casio Exilim EX-FH25Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Brand Name Casio Sony
Model Casio Exilim EX-FH25 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-07-06 2016-03-29
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz X
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 3200 12800
Highest boosted ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Min boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-520mm (20.0x) 24-600mm (25.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-4.5 f/2.4-4.0
Macro focus range 1cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.7
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 1,229 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed - 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 40.0 frames/s 14.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.30 m 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 524 gr (1.16 lbs) 1051 gr (2.32 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 472
Other
Battery life - 420 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model 4 x AA NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $450 $1,398