Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-H15
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-H15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-H15 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-FS10 and Casio EX-H15, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Casio. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and EX-H15 (14MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FS10 was introduced 12 months earlier than the EX-H15 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the EX-H15 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-H15 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Casio Exilim EX-H15. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Casio EX-H15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Casio EX-H15
EX-FS10 | EX-H15 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Casio EX-FS10
EX-H15 | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | January 2009 | More recent by 12 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Casio EX-H15
EX-FS10 | EX-H15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-H15 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FS10 offers outside dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Casio EX-H15 has measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FS10 and Casio EX-H15 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FS10 against the EX-H15.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FS10 and EX-H15 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-H15 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The graphic below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FS10 and EX-H15.
Plainly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Casio EX-H15 to deliver extra detail using its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-H15 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-H15 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Casio |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Casio Exilim EX-H15 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.2-5.7 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash modes | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 161 grams (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | NP-90 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $200 | $300 |