Clicky

Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front
 
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33

Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Key Specs

Casio EX-FS10
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
  • 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2010
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000, both Ultracompact digital cameras and both are created by Casio. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and EX-Z2000 (14MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-FS10 was revealed 12 months earlier than the EX-Z2000 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-FS10 scores against the EX-Z2000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Casio EX-Z2000

 EX-FS10 EX-Z2000 

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Casio EX-FS10

 EX-Z2000 EX-FS10 
AnnouncedJanuary 2010January 2009More recent by 12 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Casio EX-Z2000

 EX-FS10 EX-Z2000 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 has got outer measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z2000 has dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FS10 vs the EX-Z2000.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and EX-Z2000 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and EX-Z2000.

As you can see, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-Z2000 to give you greater detail because of its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Portrait photography info
Casio EX-Z2000 Portrait photography info
25
focusing manually
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
MP count low (9MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
35
you can focus manually
MP count decent (14MP)
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-FS10
Street photography with Casio EX-Z2000
47
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than competition in class (152g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-FS10
Sports photography with Casio EX-Z2000
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,250s)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Travel photography camera
Casio EX-Z2000 as a Travel photography camera
51
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
MP count low (9 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
62
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Landscape photography camera
Casio EX-Z2000 as a Landscape photography camera
26
focusing manually
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.5")
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
47
you can focus manually
rather wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Vlogging highlights
Casio EX-Z2000 Vlogging highlights
22
wide angle not good (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic support
28
rather wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic port
heavier than competition in class (152g)
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FS10 and Casio EX-Z2000
 Casio Exilim EX-FS10Casio Exilim EX-Z2000
General Information
Make Casio Casio
Model type Casio Exilim EX-FS10 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2009-01-08 2010-01-06
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3456 x 2592 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 38-114mm (3.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.9-7.1 f/2.8-6.5
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 461k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1250 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash options - Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 121g (0.27 lbs) 152g (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-80 NP-110
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $200 $0