Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000, both Ultracompact digital cameras and both are created by Casio. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and EX-Z2000 (14MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FS10 was revealed 12 months earlier than the EX-Z2000 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-FS10 scores against the EX-Z2000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Casio Exilim EX-Z2000. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| EX-FS10 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Casio EX-FS10
| EX-Z2000 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Casio EX-Z2000
| EX-FS10 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 has got outer measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z2000 has dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FS10 vs the EX-Z2000.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and EX-Z2000 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and EX-Z2000.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-Z2000 to give you greater detail because of its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-FS10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 461k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121g (0.27 lbs) | 152g (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | NP-110 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $0 |