Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa019/fa0193b60bb5af18fb50aecee2d917106dd57089" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ad94/7ad942cb02690a442d1f78b06f4ac58d3464da20" alt="Fujifilm XQ1 front Fujifilm XQ1 front"
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched November 2013
- Updated by Fujifilm XQ2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The EX-FS10 was manufactured 5 years before the Fujifilm XQ1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-FS10 grades vs the Fujifilm XQ1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Fujifilm XQ1. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Fujifilm XQ1
EX-FS10 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Casio EX-FS10
Fujifilm XQ1 | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 59 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Fujifilm XQ1
EX-FS10 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FS10 enjoys outer measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Fujifilm XQ1 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the EX-FS10 and the Fujifilm XQ1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/923c9/923c9d54efb97342294c2b3090adf8178901b3a4" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and Fujifilm XQ1 is 96 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a433/5a433543f9cd6db5a3fd6294cf43071edbb29310" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by going through specifications. The photograph here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and Fujifilm XQ1.
To sum up, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-FS10 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Fujifilm XQ1 will show greater detail due to its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10dd1/10dd1155e9a30a8fa579b5807b293d8c5cd5f594" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b17f0/b17f01cf646c9762b78d6e639e09cb8dae149fc9" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2013-11-26 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS X-TRANS II |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 2/3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.8 x 6.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 58.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, on, off, slow syncho |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121g (0.27 pounds) | 206g (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-80 | NP-48 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $200 | $500 |