Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ2
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
92 Imaging
39 Features
57 Overall
46
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced January 2015
- Previous Model is Fujifilm XQ1
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-FS10 versus Fujifilm XQ2, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and Fujifilm XQ2 (12MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm XQ2 (2/3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FS10 was unveiled 7 years earlier than the Fujifilm XQ2 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the Fujifilm XQ2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Fujifilm XQ2. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Fujifilm XQ2
EX-FS10 | Fujifilm XQ2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ2 over the Casio EX-FS10
Fujifilm XQ2 | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2015 | January 2009 | Newer by 73 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Fujifilm XQ2
EX-FS10 | Fujifilm XQ2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-FS10 has got physical dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm XQ2 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FS10 versus Fujifilm XQ2 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-FS10 against the Fujifilm XQ2.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and Fujifilm XQ2 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specifications. The picture below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FS10 and Fujifilm XQ2.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-FS10 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Fujifilm XQ2 will show more detail having an extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FS10 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Fujifilm XQ2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Fujifilm XQ2 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2015-01-14 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | EXR Processor II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS X-TRANS II |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 2/3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.8 x 6.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 58.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, on, off, slow syncho |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-80 | NP-48 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $200 | $299 |