Clicky

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M320

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Casio EX-FS10
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
  • 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
  • Released January 2009
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M320 Overview

Here is a thorough review of the Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and the M320 (9MP) is relatively similar but the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") possess totally different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-FS10 was released within a month of the M320 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-FS10 scores versus the M320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

				

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Kodak M320

 EX-FS10 M320 
Manually focus Very exact focusing

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-FS10

 M320 EX-FS10 
Screen dimension2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak M320

 EX-FS10 M320 
IntroducedJanuary 2009January 2009Similar age
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FS10 enjoys physical dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak M320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-FS10 compared to the M320.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing only by reviewing specifications. The graphic below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and M320.

Plainly, both cameras posses the exact same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The EX-FS10 provides the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Portrait photography info
Kodak M320 Portrait photography info
25
you can focus manually
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (9MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
19
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Street photography details
Kodak M320 Street photography details
47
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks RAW format
heavier than average in class (155 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Sports photography advice
Kodak M320 Sports photography advice
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,250s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Travel photography factors
Kodak M320 Travel photography factors
51
flash built-in
no Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (9MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
50
flash built-in
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (155g)
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Landscape photography factors
Kodak M320 Landscape photography factors
26
you can focus manually
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Timelapse mode
22
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Vlogging info
Kodak M320 Vlogging info
22
wide angle not the best (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone support
22
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic jack
heavier than average in class (155g)
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak M320
 Casio Exilim EX-FS10Kodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Brand Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim EX-FS10 Kodak EasyShare M320
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-08 2009-01-08
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3456 x 2592 3472 x 2604
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 38-114mm (3.0x) 34-102mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-7.1 f/2.8-5.1
Macro focus distance - 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 6.3
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1250 secs 1/1400 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.00 m
Flash settings - Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 121g (0.27 lbs) 155g (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-80 KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $200 $39