Clicky

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M341 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Key Specs

Casio EX-FS10
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
  • 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
  • Announced January 2009
Kodak M341
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 135g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Released July 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Overview

Here, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak M341, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Kodak. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and M341 (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-FS10 was brought out 6 months before the M341 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-FS10 matches up vs the M341 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Kodak M341

 EX-FS10 M341 
Focus manually More accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Kodak M341 over the Casio EX-FS10

 M341 EX-FS10 
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak M341

 EX-FS10 M341 
ReleasedJanuary 2009July 2009Similar age
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 enjoys physical dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Kodak M341 has dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs).

See the Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak M341 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the M341.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and M341 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The graphic below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and M341.

All in all, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Kodak M341 to give extra detail having its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Portrait photography details
Kodak M341 Portrait photography details
25
focusing manually
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
low resolution (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
21
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Street photography factors
Kodak M341 Street photography factors
47
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
48
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-FS10
Sports photography with Kodak M341
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,250s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
17
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Travel photography camera
Kodak M341 as a Travel photography camera
51
built-in flash
no Timelapse function
low resolution (9 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
52
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Landscape photography factors
Kodak M341 Landscape photography factors
26
focusing manually
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.5")
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Timelapse function
28
pretty good screen size (3")
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Vlogging information
Kodak M341 Vlogging information
22
wide angle not great (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone jack
22
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak M341
 Casio Exilim EX-FS10Kodak EasyShare M341
General Information
Brand Name Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim EX-FS10 Kodak EasyShare M341
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-01-08 2009-07-29
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3456 x 2592 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 38-114mm (3.0x) 35-175mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-7.1 f/3.0-4.8
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1250 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 3.20 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 121 grams (0.27 pounds) 135 grams (0.30 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-80 KLIC-7003
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch price $200 $130