Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
![Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-FS10/Casio-EX-FS10-front.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare M341 front Kodak EasyShare M341 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-M341/Kodak-M341-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 135g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Released July 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak M341, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Kodak. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and M341 (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The EX-FS10 was brought out 6 months before the M341 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-FS10 matches up vs the M341 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Kodak EasyShare M341. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Kodak M341 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Kodak M341
EX-FS10 | M341 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Kodak M341 over the Casio EX-FS10
M341 | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak M341
EX-FS10 | M341 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2009 | ![]() | July 2009 | Similar age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 enjoys physical dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Kodak M341 has dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak M341 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the M341.
![Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FS10-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M341-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and M341 is 96 and 96 respectively.
![Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FS10-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M341-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The graphic below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and M341.
All in all, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Kodak M341 to give extra detail having its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively.
![Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FS10-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M341-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FS10-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M341-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M341 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Kodak EasyShare M341 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Kodak EasyShare M341 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2009-07-29 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.0-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | 135 grams (0.30 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | KLIC-7003 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $200 | $130 |