Clicky

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M575

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs

Casio EX-FS10
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
  • 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
  • Released January 2009
Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M575 Overview

Here is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M575, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and M575 (14MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

The EX-FS10 was introduced 12 months before the M575 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before going in to a full comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-FS10 grades vs the M575 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Kodak M575

 EX-FS10 M575 
Manually focus Very exact focus

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Casio EX-FS10

 M575 EX-FS10 
IntroducedJanuary 2010January 2009Fresher by 12 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")

Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak M575

 EX-FS10 M575 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-FS10 features external dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Kodak M575 has specifications of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M575 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-FS10 vs the M575.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M575 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and M575 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M575 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and M575.

As you can tell, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Kodak M575 to give extra detail using its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M575 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M575 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Portrait photography advice
Kodak M575 Portrait photography advice
25
you can focus manually
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
28
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
no manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Street photography details
Kodak M575 Street photography details
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
48
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
low maximum ISO (1,000)
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak M575 as a Sports photography camera
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,250s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
26
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Travel photography factors
Kodak M575 Travel photography factors
51
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
resolution not great (9MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
68
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (152g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-FS10
Landscape photography with Kodak M575
26
you can focus manually
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
40
reasonably wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inch)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,000)
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-FS10
Vlogging with Kodak M575
22
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic jack
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic support
heavier than competition in class (152g)
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak M575 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak M575
 Casio Exilim EX-FS10Kodak EasyShare M575
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim EX-FS10 Kodak EasyShare M575
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-08 2010-01-05
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3456 x 2592 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 1600 1000
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 38-114mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.9-7.1 -
Macro focus range - 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1250 secs 1/1400 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.50 m
Flash modes - Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 121 gr (0.27 lb) 152 gr (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-80 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $200 $139