Clicky

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Touch

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front
 
Kodak EasyShare Touch front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Touch Key Specs

Casio EX-FS10
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
  • 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Released January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Touch Overview

In this write-up, we are matching up the Casio EX-FS10 versus Kodak Touch, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and Touch (14MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and Touch (1/3") come with different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-FS10 was unveiled 24 months prior to the Touch making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-FS10 matches up vs the Touch in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Kodak Touch

 EX-FS10 Touch 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus

Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Casio EX-FS10

 Touch EX-FS10 
ReleasedJanuary 2011January 2009More modern by 24 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak Touch

 EX-FS10 Touch 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Touch Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FS10 has outer measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Kodak Touch has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-FS10 versus Kodak Touch in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-FS10 and the Touch.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Touch size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and Touch is 96 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Touch top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Touch Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and Touch.

As you can see, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-FS10 with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Kodak Touch will give you greater detail having an extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Touch sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Touch Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Touch Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-FS10
Portrait photography with Kodak Touch
25
has manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (9 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
33
good resolution (14MP)
offers face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/3")
doesn't have RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Street photography advice
Kodak Touch Street photography advice
47
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
48
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than competitors in class (150g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak Touch as a Sports photography camera
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,250s)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (9 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
28
good resolution (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Travel photography info
Kodak Touch Travel photography info
51
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution not great (9 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
68
good resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (150g)
display isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Landscape photography advice
Kodak Touch Landscape photography advice
26
has manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
42
quite wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inch)
good resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Vlogging highlights
Kodak Touch Vlogging highlights
22
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic port
31
quite wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
has touchscreen
offers face detect autofocus
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic jack
heavier than competitors in class (150 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Touch Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak Touch
 Casio Exilim EX-FS10Kodak EasyShare Touch
General Information
Brand Name Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim EX-FS10 Kodak EasyShare Touch
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2011-01-04
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 4.8 x 3.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 17.3mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3456 x 2592 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 38-114mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-7.1 -
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 7.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/1250s 1/1600s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 3.20 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 121 grams (0.27 pounds) 150 grams (0.33 pounds)
Dimensions 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-80 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $200 $100