Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S7000
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
94 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S7000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 165g - 99 x 60 x 27mm
- Launched February 2015
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S7000 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Casio EX-FS10 versus Nikon S7000, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Casio and Nikon. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and S7000 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FS10 was introduced 7 years earlier than the S7000 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-FS10 scores versus the S7000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S7000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Nikon Coolpix S7000. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Nikon S7000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Nikon S7000
| EX-FS10 | S7000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S7000 over the Casio EX-FS10
| S7000 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 74 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Nikon S7000
| EX-FS10 | S7000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S7000 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 has got physical dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Nikon S7000 has dimensions of 99mm x 60mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FS10 versus Nikon S7000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the S7000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and S7000 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S7000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and S7000.
To sum up, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Nikon S7000 to provide you with more detail using its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S7000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Casio EX-FS10 vs Nikon S7000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Nikon Coolpix S7000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Nikon Coolpix S7000 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.2fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.70 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121g (0.27 pounds) | 165g (0.36 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 99 x 60 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 180 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-80 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $200 | $280 |
