Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR II
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26


89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh GR II, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and GR II (16MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.

The EX-FS10 was released 7 years earlier than the GR II which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-FS10 scores versus the GR II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Ricoh GR II. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Ricoh GR II
EX-FS10 | GR II |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Casio EX-FS10
GR II | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2015 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 78 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh GR II
EX-FS10 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FS10 features outer measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR II has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh GR II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the EX-FS10 and the GR II.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and GR II is 96 and 89 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The image underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and GR II.
As you can tell, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-FS10 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Ricoh GR II will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 will be behind in sensor tech.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh GR II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh GR II |
Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2015-06-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/2.8-16.0 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 300s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | 251 grams (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1078 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-80 | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $200 | $599 |