Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-FS10 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-FS10 was launched 6 years before the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the WG-4 GPS for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-FS10 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-FS10
WG-4 GPS | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | January 2009 | More recent by 61 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-FS10 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FS10 features outer dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FS10 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-FS10 and the WG-4 GPS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and WG-4 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out specs. The visual below will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to show greater detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) | 235 gr (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-80 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $200 | $210 |