Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-50
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26


91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Let's look closer at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-50, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-FS10 was revealed 9 years prior to the WG-50 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-FS10 matches up against the WG-50 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Ricoh WG-50
EX-FS10 | WG-50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-FS10
WG-50 | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 101 months |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh WG-50
EX-FS10 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FS10 comes with external dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-50 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-FS10 against the WG-50.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and WG-50 is 96 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FS10 and WG-50.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-50 to give you extra detail because of its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | On, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121g (0.27 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-80 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $200 | $280 |