Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-70
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Successor is Ricoh WG-80
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-70, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FS10 was released 12 years before the WG-70 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the WG-70 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Ricoh WG-70. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Ricoh WG-70
| EX-FS10 | WG-70 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Casio EX-FS10
| WG-70 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 134 months |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh WG-70
| EX-FS10 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FS10 provides outer measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-70 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-70 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the WG-70.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and WG-70 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing technical specs. The visual below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and WG-70.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-70 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | - | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $200 | $280 |