Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-M1
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-FS10 was introduced 6 years prior to the WG-M1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-FS10 scores against the WG-M1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-FS10 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 2.5" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-FS10
| WG-M1 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 69 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-FS10 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 features physical measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-FS10 and the WG-M1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FS10 and WG-M1 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by going through a spec sheet. The visual underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and WG-M1.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to produce extra detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-80 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $200 | $2,000 |