Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
96 Imaging
31 Features
18 Overall
25
90 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FS10 was released 4 years before the Galaxy Camera 4G and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-FS10 scores against the Galaxy Camera 4G for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
| EX-FS10 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Casio EX-FS10
| Galaxy Camera 4G | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 44 months |
| Display dimension | 4.8" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+2.3") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
| EX-FS10 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FS10 comes with outside measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has measurements of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-FS10 and the Galaxy Camera 4G.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and Galaxy Camera 4G is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching technical specs. The visual below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and Galaxy Camera 4G.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G to provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2012-08-29 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | - |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 4.8" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) | 305 gr (0.67 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $200 | $550 |