Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung MV800
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Released September 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung MV800, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and MV800 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FS10 was introduced 3 years before the MV800 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the MV800 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Samsung MV800. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung MV800
| EX-FS10 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Casio EX-FS10
| MV800 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 32 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung MV800
| EX-FS10 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 enjoys outside measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung MV800 has dimensions of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung MV800 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FS10 and the MV800.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and MV800 is 96 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by checking specs. The image here will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and MV800.
All in all, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung MV800 to resolve more detail using its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung MV800 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.20 m |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121g (0.27 pounds) | 121g (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Micro SD |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $200 | $499 |