Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung SL102
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung SL102, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is fairly close and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FS10 was launched within a month of the SL102 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-FS10 grades vs the SL102 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-FS10 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-FS10
| SL102 | EX-FS10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung SL102
| EX-FS10 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2009 |  | January 2009 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.5" |  | 2.5" | Identical display measurements |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FS10 enjoys physical measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-FS10 and the SL102.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FS10 and SL102 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and SL102.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung SL102 to render more detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images much more aggressively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also referred to as | - | ES55 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121g (0.27 pounds) | 116g (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $130 |