Clicky

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST93

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front
 
Samsung ST93 front
Portability
97
Imaging
39
Features
20
Overall
31

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs

Casio EX-FS10
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
  • 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
  • Announced January 2009
Samsung ST93
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Revealed April 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST93 Overview

On this page, we will be comparing the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung ST93, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and ST93 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-FS10 was brought out 3 years before the ST93 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-FS10 scores versus the ST93 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung ST93

 EX-FS10 ST93 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing

Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Casio EX-FS10

 ST93 EX-FS10 
RevealedApril 2011January 2009More recent by 27 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung ST93

 EX-FS10 ST93 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-FS10 has physical measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST93 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).

Examine the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung ST93 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FS10 vs the ST93.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST93 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and ST93 is 96 and 97 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST93 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and ST93.

As you can see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung ST93 to deliver greater detail having its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST93 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Portrait photography info
Samsung ST93 Portrait photography info
25
you can focus manually
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (9MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
30
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
no manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-FS10
Street photography with Samsung ST93
47
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
49
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-FS10
Sports photography with Samsung ST93
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,250 seconds)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
27
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung ST93 as a Travel photography camera
51
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
70
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
great max aperture (f)
does not have Time Lapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Landscape photography factors
Samsung ST93 Landscape photography factors
26
you can focus manually
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
38
great max aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung ST93 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not offer selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone support
27
great max aperture (f)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung ST93
 Casio Exilim EX-FS10Samsung ST93
General Information
Brand Name Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-FS10 Samsung ST93
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-01-08 2011-04-20
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 3456 x 2592 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 38-114mm (3.0x) ()
Highest aperture f/3.9-7.1 -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/1250s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 121g (0.27 lb) 110g (0.24 lb)
Physical dimensions 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-80 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse feature
Storage type SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible -
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $200 -