Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST95
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-FS10 versus Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and ST95 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-FS10 was released 24 months earlier than the ST95 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-FS10 grades versus the ST95 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Samsung ST95. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung ST95
| EX-FS10 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-FS10
| ST95 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung ST95
| EX-FS10 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 features external dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FS10 versus Samsung ST95 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-FS10 and the ST95.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and ST95 is 96 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by reading a spec sheet. The graphic here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and ST95.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Samsung ST95 to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung ST95 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $200 | $145 |