Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung TL500
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Alternate Name is EX1
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Casio EX-FS10 versus Samsung TL500, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and the TL500 (10MP) is pretty close but the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") possess different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FS10 was unveiled 18 months before the TL500 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung TL500 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-FS10 grades vs the TL500 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Samsung TL500. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung TL500
| EX-FS10 | TL500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Casio EX-FS10
| TL500 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 18 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung TL500
| EX-FS10 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-FS10 provides outside measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung TL500 has specifications of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FS10 versus Samsung TL500 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-FS10 vs the TL500.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and TL500 is 96 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The picture here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and TL500.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-FS10 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Samsung TL500 will result in more detail having an extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung TL500 |
| Also referred to as | - | EX1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-07-09 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.20 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 386 grams (0.85 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $200 | $527 |