Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB150F
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB150F, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and WB150F (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FS10 was introduced 4 years prior to the WB150F which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-FS10 matches up against the WB150F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung WB150F
| EX-FS10 | WB150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Casio EX-FS10
| WB150F | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 36 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung WB150F
| EX-FS10 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 comes with exterior dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB150F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-FS10 and the WB150F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and WB150F is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The pic underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and WB150F.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB150F to provide you with extra detail using its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung WB150F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) | 188 gr (0.41 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $200 | $230 |