Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa019/fa0193b60bb5af18fb50aecee2d917106dd57089" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba44a/ba44a222150612400a1bd4c12a80aaa4b3435771" alt="Samsung WB2200F front Samsung WB2200F front"
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Released January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The EX-FS10 was announced 6 years before the WB2200F and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-FS10 scores against the WB2200F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung WB2200F
EX-FS10 | WB2200F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-FS10
WB2200F | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 60 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung WB2200F
EX-FS10 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FS10 has exterior dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has measurements of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the WB2200F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87412/87412f8659be301796db79c7ab1b3ecde5b53f98" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and WB2200F is 96 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a82c7/a82c7891d90d97cad1270cd5c948ab1d76d202b2" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching specifications. The photograph underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and WB2200F.
Plainly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung WB2200F to render extra detail with its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a0b9/8a0b9cc3af102a0b09cfe8ddcfce057aac263094" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acdc1/acdc136fde6030c3bbc8be14e176053ef6f4dd42" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung WB2200F |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 1/8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121g (0.27 lb) | 708g (1.56 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $200 | $599 |