Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB30F
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2013
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB30F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and WB30F (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FS10 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WB30F and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-FS10 matches up vs the WB30F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Samsung WB30F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung WB30F
EX-FS10 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-FS10
WB30F | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | January 2009 | More recent by 48 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung WB30F
EX-FS10 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FS10 features outer measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB30F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the WB30F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and WB30F is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The graphic below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and WB30F.
As you can plainly see, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Samsung WB30F to give you more detail due to its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung WB30F |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 128 grams (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $200 | $180 |