Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB350F
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB350F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FS10 was announced 6 years prior to the WB350F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the WB350F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung WB350F
| EX-FS10 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-FS10
| WB350F | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 60 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung WB350F
| EX-FS10 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-FS10 has got outside measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has specifications of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB350F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the EX-FS10 against the WB350F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FS10 and WB350F is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing a spec sheet. The image below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and WB350F.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung WB350F to produce extra detail with its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung WB350F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 276 grams (0.61 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $200 | $260 |