Clicky

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Casio EX-FS10
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
  • 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Released January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung WB35F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-FS10 was manufactured 6 years before the WB35F which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-FS10 scores versus the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung WB35F

 EX-FS10 WB35F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-FS10

 WB35F EX-FS10 
ReleasedJanuary 2014January 2009Newer by 60 months
Screen size2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung WB35F

 EX-FS10 WB35F 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither comes with Touch screen

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FS10 comes with physical measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung WB35F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the EX-FS10 vs the WB35F.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and WB35F is 96 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching specifications. The image underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and WB35F.

To sum up, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung WB35F to render more detail due to its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Portrait photography camera
25
you can focus manually
no manual exposure
no external flash support
MP count low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
37
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Street photography features
Samsung WB35F Street photography features
47
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (194 grams)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Sports photography features
Samsung WB35F Sports photography features
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,250s)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-FS10
Travel photography with Samsung WB35F
51
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
MP count low (9MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
70
lighter than average (194 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (288mm)
no Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB35F Landscape photography factors
26
you can focus manually
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
43
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-FS10
Vlogging with Samsung WB35F
22
wide angle not great (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic port
31
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (194g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung WB35F
 Casio Exilim EX-FS10Samsung WB35F
General Information
Brand Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-FS10 Samsung WB35F
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-01-08 2014-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3456 x 2592 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 38-114mm (3.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.9-7.1 f/3.1-6.3
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 1s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/1250s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 121g (0.27 pounds) 194g (0.43 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-80 BP70A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $200 $130