Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung WB35F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FS10 was manufactured 6 years before the WB35F which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-FS10 scores versus the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung WB35F
| EX-FS10 | WB35F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-FS10
| WB35F | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 60 months |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung WB35F
| EX-FS10 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FS10 comes with physical measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung WB35F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the EX-FS10 vs the WB35F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and WB35F is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching specifications. The image underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and WB35F.
To sum up, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung WB35F to render more detail due to its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121g (0.27 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $200 | $130 |