Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Launched January 2014
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-FS10 versus Samsung WB50F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-FS10 was released 6 years before the WB50F and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the WB50F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Samsung WB50F. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung WB50F
EX-FS10 | WB50F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-FS10
WB50F | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | January 2009 | More recent by 60 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung WB50F
EX-FS10 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 has physical measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FS10 versus Samsung WB50F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FS10 compared to the WB50F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and WB50F is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by going through technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and WB50F.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Samsung WB50F to produce greater detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Samsung WB50F |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121g (0.27 lbs) | 207g (0.46 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $200 | $180 |