Clicky

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front
 
Samsung WB50F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs

Casio EX-FS10
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
  • 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
  • Launched January 2009
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Launched January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-FS10 versus Samsung WB50F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-FS10 was released 6 years before the WB50F and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the WB50F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Samsung WB50F

 EX-FS10 WB50F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-FS10

 WB50F EX-FS10 
LaunchedJanuary 2014January 2009More recent by 60 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung WB50F

 EX-FS10 WB50F 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FS10 has physical measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-FS10 versus Samsung WB50F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FS10 compared to the WB50F.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and WB50F is 96 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by going through technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and WB50F.

As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Samsung WB50F to produce greater detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Portrait photography camera
25
you can focus manually
no manual mode
can't use external flash
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
37
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-FS10
Street photography with Samsung WB50F
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (207 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB50F Sports photography highlights
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,250s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
resolution not great (9MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Travel photography camera
51
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
resolution not great (9MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
69
lighter than others (207g)
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
long zoom (288mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB50F Landscape photography highlights
26
you can focus manually
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
47
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
lack of manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-FS10
Vlogging with Samsung WB50F
22
wide angle not great (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone socket
30
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (207g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not posses selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-FS10 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FS10 and Samsung WB50F
 Casio Exilim EX-FS10Samsung WB50F
General Information
Brand Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-FS10 Samsung WB50F
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-01-08 2014-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3456 x 2592 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 38-114mm (3.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.9-7.1 f/3.1-6.3
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1 seconds -
Fastest shutter speed 1/1250 seconds -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 121g (0.27 lbs) 207g (0.46 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-80 BP70A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $200 $180