Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26


77 Imaging
55 Features
43 Overall
50
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Introduced September 2010
- Newer Model is Sigma SD1 Merrill

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Casio EX-FS10 versus Sigma SD1, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Casio and Sigma. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and SD1 (15MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and SD1 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor dimensions.

The EX-FS10 was manufactured 20 months earlier than the SD1 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-FS10 matches up versus the SD1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Sigma SD1. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Sigma SD1
EX-FS10 | SD1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 over the Casio EX-FS10
SD1 | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 20 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Sigma SD1
EX-FS10 | SD1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FS10 enjoys outer dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 has measurements of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FS10 versus Sigma SD1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FS10 against the SD1.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FS10 and SD1 is 96 and 77 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FS10 and SD1.
Clearly, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-FS10 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma SD1 will produce extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 will be behind in sensor tech.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sigma SD1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sigma SD1 |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-09-21 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4800 x 3200 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 2 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 15 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $200 | $2,339 |