Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa019/fa0193b60bb5af18fb50aecee2d917106dd57089" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46cfd/46cfd6b1b2504d733a07dd4a231b6abe09baa859" alt="Sigma SD1 Merrill front Sigma SD1 Merrill front"
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Launched April 2012
- Superseded the Sigma SD1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-FS10 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Casio and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and SD1 Merrill (15MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The EX-FS10 was released 4 years earlier than the SD1 Merrill which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-FS10 scores versus the SD1 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Sigma SD1 Merrill. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
EX-FS10 | SD1 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Casio EX-FS10
SD1 Merrill | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 39 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
EX-FS10 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera often, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FS10 provides exterior dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has proportions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FS10 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the SD1 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d65a/0d65a8e5714a0c83e448598a93a43008090cfbb0" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and SD1 Merrill is 96 and 57 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2579f/2579f688a87185408f6c4824ee91e30dec4cf52c" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions simply by checking out a spec sheet. The image below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and SD1 Merrill.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-FS10 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/336a9/336a9dbcc535731179c3b7417a7a5f65d71e362d" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8eb5c/8eb5cc7472b25ed9e4dea4eb08d8f11e5779fdb8" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2012-04-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4800 x 3200 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lb) | 790 gr (1.74 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $200 | $2,339 |