Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD15
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
59 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Launched February 2010
- Replaced the Sigma SD14
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD15 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-FS10 versus Sigma SD15, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Sigma. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and SD15 (5MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and SD15 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-FS10 was unveiled 13 months prior to the SD15 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD15 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the SD15 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD15 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Sigma SD15. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Sigma SD15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Sigma SD15
EX-FS10 | SD15 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD15 over the Casio EX-FS10
SD15 | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2010 | January 2009 | Fresher by 13 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Sigma SD15
EX-FS10 | SD15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD15 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-FS10 provides exterior measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sigma SD15 has specifications of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") with a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FS10 versus Sigma SD15 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the SD15.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and SD15 is 96 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD15 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by researching specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and SD15.
To sum up, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-FS10 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Casio EX-FS10 will provide you with more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD15 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma SD15 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sigma SD15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sigma SD15 |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-02-20 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | True II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 2640 x 1760 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) | 750 gr (1.65 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $200 | $1,500 |